Gunn v. Wood
24 S.E. 407, 99 Ga. 70
Opinion
A bill of exceptions which merely alleges that the defendant in certiorari “moved to dismiss the petition for certiorari upon certain grounds, which the court granted,” and that “the court erred in dismissing said certiorari,” without specifying what were the grounds upon which the motion to dismiss was based, presents no question upon which the Supreme Court can intelligently pass. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gunn v. Wood, 24 S.E. 407, 99 Ga. 70 (Ga. 1896).
24 S.E. 407 (Gunn v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Witherspoon v. Wright
106 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Decatur Chevrolet Co. v. White
180 S.E. 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Flood v. Empire Investment Co.
133 S.E. 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Lynch v. Southern Express Co.
90 S.E. 527 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Shippey Bros. v. Owens
86 S.E. 407 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Knight
50 S.E. 124 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)