Witherspoon v. Wright

106 S.E.2d 159, 98 Ga. App. 465, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 613
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 24, 1958
Docket37404
StatusPublished

This text of 106 S.E.2d 159 (Witherspoon v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Witherspoon v. Wright, 106 S.E.2d 159, 98 Ga. App. 465, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 613 (Ga. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

The judge's order sustaining the oral motion to dismiss the petition for certiorari did not state what grounds that motion contained and did not state on what grounds the motion was being sustained. The bill of exceptions does not show upon what grounds the petition for certiorari was dismissed but it merely contains a statement that the motion to dismiss was sustained and that such was contrary to law.

A bill of exceptions which does not show upon what grounds the petition for certiorari was dismissed presents no question for decision. Gunn v. Wood, 99 Ga. 70 (24 S. E. 407).

Writ of error dismissed.

Quillian and Nichols, JJ., concur. Louis M. Tatham, for plaintiff in error. N. Forrest Montet, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gunn v. Wood
24 S.E. 407 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 S.E.2d 159, 98 Ga. App. 465, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/witherspoon-v-wright-gactapp-1958.