Guardian Life Insurance v. Zimlich
250 S.W. 139, 198 Ky. 616, 1923 Ky. LEXIS 577
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
Affirming.
In this case no brief has been filed by appellant. The practice is firmly established by this court that “in the absence of a brief specifying the errors for which a reversal is asked it will 'be presumed that no error's exist, and that the judgment is correct.” Spradlin v. Spradlin, 170 Ky. 297; Commonwealth v. L. & E. Ry. Co., 167 Ky. 442; Continental Insurance Co. v. Ramsey, 160 Ky. 441.
Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guardian Life Insurance v. Zimlich, 250 S.W. 139, 198 Ky. 616, 1923 Ky. LEXIS 577 (Ky. Ct. App. 1923).
250 S.W. 139 (Guardian Life Insurance v. Zimlich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clay County v. First National Bank of Manchester
31 S.W.2d 927 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1930)
Whitt v. Pikeville National Bank
6 S.W.2d 1073 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1928)
Hunt v. Pikeville National Bank
292 S.W. 327 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1927)
Cochran v. Cope
270 S.W. 815 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1925)
Suter v. Christian
251 S.W. 619 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)