Spradlin v. Spradlin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Spradlin v. Spradlin

185 S.W. 838, 170 Ky. 297, 1916 Ky. LEXIS 34

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedMay 19, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 185 S.W. 838 (Spradlin v. Spradlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spradlin v. Spradlin, 185 S.W. 838, 170 Ky. 297, 1916 Ky. LEXIS 34 (Ky. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION. OF THE COURT BY

WlLLIAM ROGERS CLAY, Commissioneb,

Affirming.

In this ease no brief has been filed by appellant. In the absence of a brief specifying the errors for which a reversal is asked, it will be presumed that no errors exist, and that the judgment is correct. Commonwealth v. Lexington & Eastern Ry. Co., 167 Ky. 422, 180 S. W. 532; Continental Insurance Co. v. Ramsey, 160 Ky. 441, 169 S. W. 855; Crawford v. Wiedemann, 158 Ky, 333, 164 S. W. 981; Brown v. Daniels, 154 Ky. 267, 157 S. W. 3.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI