Spradlin v. Spradlin
185 S.W. 838, 170 Ky. 297, 1916 Ky. LEXIS 34
Opinion
OPINION. OF THE COURT BY
Affirming.
In this ease no brief has been filed by appellant. In the absence of a brief specifying the errors for which a reversal is asked, it will be presumed that no errors exist, and that the judgment is correct. Commonwealth v. Lexington & Eastern Ry. Co., 167 Ky. 422, 180 S. W. 532; Continental Insurance Co. v. Ramsey, 160 Ky. 441, 169 S. W. 855; Crawford v. Wiedemann, 158 Ky, 333, 164 S. W. 981; Brown v. Daniels, 154 Ky. 267, 157 S. W. 3.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spradlin v. Spradlin, 185 S.W. 838, 170 Ky. 297, 1916 Ky. LEXIS 34 (Ky. Ct. App. 1916).
185 S.W. 838 (Spradlin v. Spradlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitt v. Pikeville National Bank
6 S.W.2d 1073 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1928)
Hunt v. Pikeville National Bank
292 S.W. 327 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1927)
Guardian Life Insurance v. Zimlich
250 S.W. 139 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)