Clay County v. First National Bank of Manchester
This text of 31 S.W.2d 927 (Clay County v. First National Bank of Manchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
Affirming.
Although joining in with the appellee’s motion to advance this case, appellant has filed no brief in support of its appeal. Appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal on many grounds, none of which we need at this time consider, as the practice is firmly established that, in *559 the absence of a brief specifying the errors for which a reversal is asked, it will be presumed that no errors exist and the judgment is correct. Suter v. Christian, 199 Ky. 495, 251 S. W. 619; Guardian Life Insurance Co. v. Zimlich, 198 Ky. 616, 250 S. W. 139; Cochran v. Cope, 208 Ky. 401, 270 S. W. 998; Whitt v. Pikeville National Bank, 224 Ky. 648, 6 S. W. (2d) 1073.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 S.W.2d 927, 235 Ky. 558, 1930 Ky. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-county-v-first-national-bank-of-manchester-kyctapphigh-1930.