Gruber v. Savannah River Lumber Co.

Fourth Circuit

Gruber v. Savannah River Lumber Co.

2 F.2d 418, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2063

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 1924·No. No. 2263·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are not prepared to assent to the construction placed by the District Judge on tho decision of tho Supreme Court of South Carolina in Richardson v. Cooler, 115 S. C. 102, 104 S. E. 305. On that point it is not necessary to express an opinion. We adopt the reasoning of the District Judge on which he reaches the conclusion that Mr. Gruber is estopped, and on that ground affirm the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are not prepared to assent to the construction placed by the District Judge on tho decision of tho Supreme Court of South Carolina in Richardson v. Cooler, 115 S. C. 102, 104 S. E. 305. On that point it is not necessary to express an opinion. We adopt the reasoning of the District Judge on which he reaches the conclusion that Mr. Gruber is estopped, and on that ground affirm the judgment.

Affirmed.

Gruber v. Savannah River Lumber Co., 2 F.2d 418, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2063 (4th Cir. 1924).

Pincite

2 F.2d 418 (Gruber v. Savannah River Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related