Gruber v. Savannah River Lumber Co.
This text of 2 F.2d 418 (Gruber v. Savannah River Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are not prepared to assent to the construction placed by the District Judge on tho decision of tho Supreme Court of South Carolina in Richardson v. Cooler, 115 S. C. 102, 104 S. E. 305. On that point it is not necessary to express an opinion. We adopt the reasoning of the District Judge on which he reaches the conclusion that Mr. Gruber is estopped, and on that ground affirm the judgment.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 F.2d 418, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gruber-v-savannah-river-lumber-co-ca4-1924.