Grove v. State

784 So. 2d 1243, 2001 WL 484029
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2001·No. 2D00-2779·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

784 So.2d 1243 (2001)

Craig Allen GROVE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D00-2779.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 9, 2001.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

THREADGILL, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant, Craig Allen Grove, challenges his judgment and sentence for possession of cannabis. He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence against him. We find no merit in that contention and thus affirm on that issue. We, however, remand this cause for the entry of a corrected probation order consistent with another postconviction order entered by the trial court, granting Grove's motion to correct his original probation order.

Affirmed, but remanded for entry of an appropriate order.

WHATLEY, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grove v. State, 784 So. 2d 1243, 2001 WL 484029 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

784 So. 2d 1243 (Grove v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosales v. State
818 So. 2d 684 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Royce v. State
817 So. 2d 870 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Brooke v. State
807 So. 2d 777 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)