Brooke v. State

807 So. 2d 777, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1754, 2002 WL 235741
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2002
DocketNo. 2D00-5443
StatusPublished

This text of 807 So. 2d 777 (Brooke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooke v. State, 807 So. 2d 777, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1754, 2002 WL 235741 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

FULMER, Judge.

We affirm Brooke’s convictions for DUI manslaughter, DUI with serious bodily injury, and three counts of DUI with property damage. We remand, however, for entry of a corrected probation order consistent with the trial court’s order correcting a sentencing error. See Grove v. State, 784 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed, but remanded for entry of a corrected probation order.

CASANUEVA and COVINGTON, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grove v. State
784 So. 2d 1243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
807 So. 2d 777, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1754, 2002 WL 235741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooke-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.