Royce v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Royce v. State

817 So. 2d 870, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5182, 2002 WL 662652

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 24, 2002

DocketNo. 2D00-2022

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 817 So. 2d 870 (Royce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Royce v. State, 817 So. 2d 870, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5182, 2002 WL 662652 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

FULMER, Judge.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions for arson of a dwelling and violation of an injunction. We remand, however, for entry of a corrected probation order consistent with the trial court’s order, entered June 25, 2001, granting Appellant’s motion to correct a sentencing error. See Grove v. State, 784 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed, but remanded for entry of a corrected probation order.

CASANUEVA and SILBERMAN, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FULMER, Judge.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions for arson of a dwelling and violation of an injunction. We remand, however, for entry of a corrected probation order consistent with the trial court’s order, entered June 25, 2001, granting Appellant’s motion to correct a sentencing error. See Grove v. State, 784 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed, but remanded for entry of a corrected probation order.

CASANUEVA and SILBERMAN, JJ„ Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

817 So. 2d 870, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5182, 2002 WL 662652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royce-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack