Royce v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Royce v. State

817 So. 2d 870, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5182, 2002 WL 662652

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 2002·No. No. 2D00-2022·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FULMER, Judge.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions for arson of a dwelling and violation of an injunction. We remand, however, for entry of a corrected probation order consistent with the trial court’s order, entered June 25, 2001, granting Appellant’s motion to correct a sentencing error. See Grove v. State, 784 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed, but remanded for entry of a corrected probation order.

CASANUEVA and SILBERMAN, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FULMER, Judge.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions for arson of a dwelling and violation of an injunction. We remand, however, for entry of a corrected probation order consistent with the trial court’s order, entered June 25, 2001, granting Appellant’s motion to correct a sentencing error. See Grove v. State, 784 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed, but remanded for entry of a corrected probation order.

CASANUEVA and SILBERMAN, JJ„ Concur.

Royce v. State, 817 So. 2d 870, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5182, 2002 WL 662652 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

817 So. 2d 870 (Royce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related