Grout v. Gates

124 A. 76, 97 Vt. 434, 1924 Vt. LEXIS 181
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedMarch 7, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 124 A. 76 (Grout v. Gates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grout v. Gates, 124 A. 76, 97 Vt. 434, 1924 Vt. LEXIS 181 (Vt. 1924).

Opinions

This is a complaint for mandamus brought by the relator as Secretary of State to the defendant as Auditor of Accounts in and for the State. The facts here stated are given by paragraphs numbered as in the complaint.

3. That the relator as Secretary of State is at the head of the automobile department and has charge of the registration of motor vehicles, the licensing of operators, and, by way of law enforcement, the investigation of offenses against the motor vehicle laws and the suspension of operator's licenses, and in the performance of such duties employs clerks, inspectors and examiners.

4. That in the calendar year 1922 pleasure vehicles and trucks to the number of 43,881, motor cycles to the number of 856, and dealers to the number of 305 were registered, motor vehicles to the number of 5,408, were re-registered, and operator's and chauffeur's licenses to the number of 50,897, certificates of hire to the number of 154 and zone licenses to the number of 38 were issued, yielding a gross revenue of $781,982.00; that in the calendar year 1923 pleasure vehicles and trucks to the number of 52,776, motor cycles to the number of 839, and dealers to the number of 360 were registered, motor vehicles to the number of 6,983 were re-registered, and operator's and chauffeur's licenses to the number of 59,507, certificates of hire to the number of 173 and zone licenses to the number of 50 were issued, yielding a gross revenue of $938,860.30 — thus showing an increase in 1923 over 1922 of 8,895 registrations of pleasure vehicles and trucks, or 20.2%, of 1,575 re-registrations or 29.1%, and 8,610 operator's and chauffeur's licenses or 16.9%, and an increase in revenue of $156,878.00 or 20%; and that the above mention increase in volume of business required an increase in the number of clerks and employees over the number employed in 1922 to properly care for the same.

5. That during the season of 1923 the violations of the motor vehicle laws multiplied and increased; that during the year 54 persons were killed, 1,060 persons were injured, and property to the value of $229,290.00 was damaged in automobile accidents, which figures show an increase of approximately 50% over 1922 and of approximately 100% over 1921; that during *Page 442 1923 over 4,200 automobile accidents were reported as required by law, an increase of 700 over reported accidents for 1922; that the small number of inspectors and examiners employed by the relator in 1923 were unable to cope with, or prevent the violation of the motor vehicle laws, or the careless and negligent operation of automobiles causing accidents, or the presence of intoxicated persons driving motor vehicles upon the highways of the State; that the safety of the public using the highways of the State demanded and will continue to demand a much more stringent law enforcement through an increased number of inspectors and examiners; that the violations of motor vehicle laws in this paragraph referred to was a condition existing and present throughout the latter part of the summer of 1923, and especially through the month of October in that year.

6. That the cost of the automobile department for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1922, was $67,677.10, and the cost of the fiscal year ending June 30, 1923, was $65,447.27; that the General Assembly of 1923 appropriated for said department for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1924, the sum of $66,000.00, and for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1925, the sum of $68,000.00, and in addition the sum of $1,500.00 for each of said years for salary to the relator as registrar.

7. That the aforesaid appropriations were and will be inadequate for the administration of said department during the current fiscal year and during the next fiscal year respectively, and the appropriation for the current year will be exhausted not later than March 15, 1924; that an interruption of the service of said department will result in the disbursal and disorganization of its working force, the loss of experienced service, the resumption of work with inadequate and inefficient help, to the dissatisfaction and inconvenience of the public and with increased expense to the State.

8. That the relator, when confronted with the conditions above mentioned during the summer and early fall of 1923, brought the same to the consideration of the emergency board created by section 38 of number 7 of the Acts of 1923; that the aforesaid conditions and facts were laid before and considered by said emergency board on October 26, 1923, and after full consideration thereof, said board by unanimous vote adopted a resolution, *Page 443 a copy of which was furnished to the relator and to the State Treasurer; that said resolution was as follows:

"Whereas, It appears that there has been a large and unforeseen number of motor vehicles registered this year over last year, with the probability of a further large increase during the next fiscal year, which increase was wholly unexpected by the last Legislature, and will require an increased number of employees in said department to render prompt and efficient service in registration and delivery of number plates and in the enforcement of the laws, and

Whereas, It further appears that there have been approximately thirty-four hundred automobile accidents reported to the Secretary of State during the present calendar year, resulting in forty fatalities, which serve to emphasize the lack of and the need of adequate law enforcement, and

Whereas, It further appears that, unless an increased appropriation is made, law enforcement and the efficiency of the registration bureau will be crippled, now

Therefore, Be It Resolved, That the emergency board created by section 38 of number 7 of the Laws of 1923, duly assembled on the call of His Excellency, the Governor of Vermont, deem the premises above set forth to constitute an emergency for which said board should provide, and

That the sum of thirty-two thousand dollars ($32,000.00) for the current fiscal year, and the sum of forty-two thousand dollars ($42,000.00) for the fiscal year ending July 1, 1925, be and the same hereby are appropriated and set apart for the years named, out of the general funds of the State of Vermont or any fund not otherwise appropriated, for the use of the Secretary of State in the automobile department, including enforcement of such laws of the State as come under his jurisdiction, and said sums are hereby added to the sums appropriated in section 59 (a) 1, and 59 (a) 2 of number 28 of the Laws of 1923, respectively, and

That the credit of the State be, and it is hereby pledged in a sum not exceeding the sums named in the last preceding paragraph for the purposes therein named, and that the State Treasurer provide funds for the purposes herein indicated, not to exceed the sums hereinbefore named, and said Treasurer is hereby authorized to furnish and pay out said sums, or so much thereof as may be needed, on the warrants of the State Auditor, which warrants said Auditor is hereby authorized to draw, on requisition of the Secretary of State." *Page 444

9. That "The General Assembly appropriated the sum of $100,000.00 to the uses of said emergency board for each fiscal year of the current biennial period, or so much thereof as may be necessary for emergency purposes."

10. That on the 30th day of November, 1923, said State Treasurer, pursuant to said resolution, credited on his books the said sum of $32,000.00 to the relator for automobile registration for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1924, and that on the first day of each month thereafter said Treasurer has furnished the relator and the defendant a record showing such credit.

11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fuss v. Gaudet
Vermont Superior Court, 2026
Auditor v. Attorney General
Vermont Superior Court, 2025
Gero v. Davis
Vermont Superior Court, 2012
Rheaume v. Pallito
2011 VT 72 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2011)
Hunter v. State
2004 VT 108 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2004)
Addison County Community Action v. City of Vergennes
565 A.2d 233 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1989)
Opinion No. Oag 16-83, (1983)
72 Op. Att'y Gen. 49 (Wisconsin Attorney General Reports, 1983)
Lowry v. City of Cleveland
290 N.E.2d 865 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 1972)
Opinion of the Justices to the House of Representatives
323 Mass. 764 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)
Matter of Mae Disorda Savage
22 A.2d 153 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1941)
In Re Cornell
18 A.2d 151 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1941)
Suppiger v. Enking
91 P.2d 362 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1939)
State Highway Board v. Gates
1 A.2d 825 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1938)
E. B. & A. C. Whiting Co. v. City of Burlington
175 A. 35 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A. 76, 97 Vt. 434, 1924 Vt. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grout-v-gates-vt-1924.