Home/Court of Appeals of Maryland/Grote v. Rogers

Grote v. Rogers

149 A. 551, 158 Md. 695
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMarch 13, 1930
Docket[Nos. 29, 30, 31, January Term, 1930.]
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 A. 551 (Grote v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grote v. Rogers, 149 A. 551, 158 Md. 695 (Md. 1930).

Opinion

A per curiam opinion was delivered as follows:

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the case of Sophie Grote v. Mrs. Charles Stanley Rogers, being No. 28 on the docket of the present term, the similar orders in the cases of Henry Grote, Helen Riddle and J. Frank Riddle, against the same appellee, being Eos. 29, 30 and 31, on the docket of the present term, and involving the same question, are hereby affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Perkins
181 A. 436 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 A. 551, 158 Md. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grote-v-rogers-md-1930.