Grossman v. Public Utilities Commission

214 N.E.2d 666, 5 Ohio St. 2d 189, 34 Ohio Op. 2d 347, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 407
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 2, 1966
DocketNo. 39436
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 214 N.E.2d 666 (Grossman v. Public Utilities Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grossman v. Public Utilities Commission, 214 N.E.2d 666, 5 Ohio St. 2d 189, 34 Ohio Op. 2d 347, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 407 (Ohio 1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case presents a question of fact. The burden of proof rests upon the complainant. He has failed to produce evidence to establish his claim. The order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corrigan v. Illum. Co. (Slip Opinion)
2017 Ohio 7555 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2017)
Luntz Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm.
1997 Ohio 342 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Luntz Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission
79 Ohio St. 3d 509 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Myers v. Public Utilities Commission
595 N.E.2d 873 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)
Myers v. Pub. Util. Comm.
1992 Ohio 135 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)
Thomas v. Public Utilities Commission
493 N.E.2d 1328 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1986)
Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
471 N.E.2d 475 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 N.E.2d 666, 5 Ohio St. 2d 189, 34 Ohio Op. 2d 347, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-public-utilities-commission-ohio-1966.