Grossetti v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VICTOR E. GROSSETTI, JR., on behalf of Estate of Page Llewellyn Jackson, II, Plaintiff, 19-CV-6784 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Defendant. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated September 26, 2019, the Court denied the application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and directed Plaintiff to pay the $400.00 in fees required to bring an action in this Court. The Court further directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not paid the relevant fees or filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court dismisses the complaint without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to note service on the docket. Plaintiff has consented to receive electronic service of Court filings. (ECF No. 3.) The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444- 45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: December 17, 2019 . New York, New York hie l Hk COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grossetti v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Grossetti v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.