Griffin v. State

95 So. 3d 418, 2012 WL 3289219, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13406
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 14, 2012·No. No. 1D12-2696·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a rule 3.850 motion raising what appears to be three claims. We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief [419]*419on all of the claims, but note with particularity that the appellant has raised a claim that section 893.13, Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional due to Shelton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011). We deny this claim as well for the reasons set forth in Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412, 2012 WL 2849485 (Fla. July 12, 2012) (affirming the constitutionality of section 893.13).

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, DAVIS, and ROBERTS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin v. State, 95 So. 3d 418, 2012 WL 3289219, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13406 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

95 So. 3d 418 (Griffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
96 So. 3d 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
802 F. Supp. 2d 1289 (M.D. Florida, 2011)