Green v. State

132 So. 3d 849, 2013 WL 6636466, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19953
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 2013·No. No. 4D12-2694·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Review of the entire record on appeal and this brief demonstrates the absence of any issues of arguable merit which could be advanced in good conscience on appellant’s behalf. However, we note that the record on appeal does not include a written order revoking Green’s probation in the 2008 case and stating which conditions she violated. A written order is required. See Amador v. State, 80 So.3d 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of probation and sentence in the 2008 prosecution in this case, but remand for entry of the required written order revoking probation. We affirm the adjudication and sentence in the 2012 case.

Affirmed and Remanded.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Green v. State, 132 So. 3d 849, 2013 WL 6636466, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19953 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

132 So. 3d 849 (Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniel Lenz v. State of Florida
183 So. 3d 1239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)