Amador v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Amador v. State

80 So. 3d 1130, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3250, 2012 WL 634478

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 29, 2012

DocketNo. 4D10-2260

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 So. 3d 1130 (Amador v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amador v. State, 80 So. 3d 1130, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3250, 2012 WL 634478 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant appointed appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our review of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit. However, the record does not contain a written order revoking probation and specifying the conditions which appellant violated. Therefore, we affirm the revocation of probation and sentence, but remand for entry of a written order revoking probation and specifying the conditions which appellant violated. See Jones v. State, 12 So.3d 320, 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Smith v. State, 6 So.3d 116, 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed and remanded.

POLEN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant appointed appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our review of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit. However, the record does not contain a written order revoking probation and specifying the conditions which appellant violated. Therefore, we affirm the revocation of probation and sentence, but remand for entry of a written order revoking probation and specifying the conditions which appellant violated. See Jones v. State, 12 So.3d 320, 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Smith v. State, 6 So.3d 116, 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed and remanded.

POLEN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 So. 3d 1130, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3250, 2012 WL 634478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amador-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack