Amador v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Amador v. State

80 So. 3d 1130, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3250, 2012 WL 634478

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 29, 2012·No. No. 4D10-2260·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant appointed appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our review of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit. However, the record does not contain a written order revoking probation and specifying the conditions which appellant violated. Therefore, we affirm the revocation of probation and sentence, but remand for entry of a written order revoking probation and specifying the conditions which appellant violated. See Jones v. State, 12 So.3d 320, 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Smith v. State, 6 So.3d 116, 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed and remanded.

POLEN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant appointed appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our review of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit. However, the record does not contain a written order revoking probation and specifying the conditions which appellant violated. Therefore, we affirm the revocation of probation and sentence, but remand for entry of a written order revoking probation and specifying the conditions which appellant violated. See Jones v. State, 12 So.3d 320, 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Smith v. State, 6 So.3d 116, 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed and remanded.

POLEN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Amador v. State, 80 So. 3d 1130, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3250, 2012 WL 634478 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

80 So. 3d 1130 (Amador v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related