Green v. State

83 So. 3d 883, 2012 WL 162122, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 677
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 2012
Docket5D11-1376
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 So. 3d 883 (Green v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green v. State, 83 So. 3d 883, 2012 WL 162122, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 677 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Green’s convictions and sentence without prejudice to his right to seek appropriate and timely postconviction relief. See Dunbar v. State, 35 So.3d 54, 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (sentencing errors that occur after effective date of amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), even if formerly deemed fundamental or patent on face of record, cannot be reviewed by appellate court if issue is not raised at sentencing or in timely post-sentencing proceeding pursuant to Rule 3.800); see also Williams v. State, 56 So.3d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED.

MONACO, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tommy L. Green, Sr. v. State of Florida
190 So. 3d 1026 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 So. 3d 883, 2012 WL 162122, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.