Green v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Green v. State

200 S.W.3d 898, 360 Ark. 306

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJanuary 13, 2005

DocketCR 04-1379

StatusPublished

This text of 200 S.W.3d 898 (Green v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Green v. State, 200 S.W.3d 898, 360 Ark. 306 (Ark. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Billy Dale Green, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Steven M. Harper, states in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Therefore, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Billy Dale Green, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Steven M. Harper, states in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Therefore, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 S.W.3d 898, 360 Ark. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-v-state-ark-2005.