Jones v. State

2015 Ark. App. 4
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 14, 2015
DocketCR-14-451
StatusPublished

This text of 2015 Ark. App. 4 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 4 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 4

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CR-14-451

Opinion Delivered January 14, 2015

ROBERT EDWARD JONES APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2007-49D] V. HONORABLE RALPH WILSON, JR., STATE OF ARKANSAS JUDGE APPELLEE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge

The Crittenden County Circuit Court revoked Robert Jones’s probation and

sentenced him to twelve years’ imprisonment. On appeal, Jones’s counsel argues that

there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and asks to be relieved as counsel. The clerk

of our court mailed a certified copy of counsel’s motion and brief to Jones in accordance

with Rule 4-3(k)(2) of the Arkansas Rules of the Supreme Court, informing him of his

right to file pro se points for reversal. Jones has not filed pro se points for reversal.

Because counsel has complied with the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we grant the motion

to be relieved and affirm.

The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error, but

whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. Tucker v. State, 47 Ark. App. 96, 885

S.W.2d 904 (1994). Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to

1 Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 4

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold

that Jones’s appeal is wholly without merit. Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of

In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985), we issue this

memorandum opinion granting counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirming the court’s

revocation.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

VAUGHT and BROWN, JJ., agree.

S. Butler Bernard, Jr., for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Tucker v. State
885 S.W.2d 904 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1994)
In Re Memorandum Opinions
700 S.W.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 Ark. App. 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-arkctapp-2015.