Green 135999 v. Arizona Department of Corrections

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedNovember 6, 2023
Docket2:23-cv-01763
StatusUnknown

This text of Green 135999 v. Arizona Department of Corrections (Green 135999 v. Arizona Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Green 135999 v. Arizona Department of Corrections, (D. Ariz. 2023).

Opinion

1 JL 2 WO 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 John Allen Green, No. CV-23-01763-PHX-JAT (ASB) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Arizona Department of Corrections, et al., 13 Defendants.

14 15 On August 24, 2023, Plaintiff John Allen Green, who is confined in the Arizona 16 State Prison Complex-Lewis, filed a pro se “Writ of Habeas Corpus” (Doc. 1), which the 17 Clerk of Court docketed as a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to 18 facilitate its consideration. On September 11, 2023, Plaintiff filed an Application to 19 Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas) (Doc. 4) and a Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 6). 20 The Court will deny the deficient Application to Proceed and the Motion and will give 21 Plaintiff 30 days to (1) pay the filing and administrative fees or file a complete Application 22 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and (2) file an amended complaint using the court-approved 23 form included with this Order. 24 I. Payment of Filing Fee 25 When bringing an action, a prisoner must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and a 26 $52.00 administrative fee in a lump sum or, if granted the privilege of proceeding in forma 27 pauperis, pay the $350.00 filing fee incrementally as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 28 An application to proceed in forma pauperis requires an affidavit of indigence and a 1 certified copy of the inmate’s trust account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 2 six months preceding the filing of the Complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). An inmate must 3 submit statements from each institution where he was confined during the six-month 4 period. Id. To assist prisoners in meeting these requirements, the Court requires use of a 5 form application. LRCiv 3.4. 6 If a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will assess an 7 initial partial filing fee of 20% of either the average monthly deposits or the average 8 monthly balance in Plaintiff’s account, whichever is greater. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). An 9 initial partial filing fee will only be collected when funds exist. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). 10 The balance of the $350.00 filing fee will be collected in monthly payments of 20% of the 11 preceding month’s income credited to an inmate’s account, each time the amount in the 12 account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 13 II. Application Fails to Comply with Statute 14 Plaintiff has used the court-approved form for an Application to Proceed In Forma 15 Pauperis in a habeas corpus proceeding, rather than the court-approved form for an 16 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in a civil rights proceeding. Thus, the Court 17 will deny the Application to Proceed and will give Plaintiff 30 days to either pay the 18 $402.00 filing and administrative fees or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma 19 Pauperis. 20 The Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation & Reentry (ADC) has 21 notified the Court that a certified trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) 22 showing deposits and average monthly balances is available from the ADC’s Central 23 Office. Accordingly, Plaintiff must obtain the certified copy of his ADC trust fund account 24 statement for the six months immediately preceding the filing of the Complaint from the 25 ADC’s Central Office. 26 Plaintiff should be aware that Department Order (DO) 905.10 relates to “Filing 27 Lawsuits with State and Federal Courts” and provides information regarding how to 28 properly request the required “certified statement of account.” Specifically, DO 905.10 1 states: 2 10.1 To request a certified statement of account, inmates shall send an Inmate Letter, to their Business Office 3 where they are housed. The Business Office designee 4 shall scan and email the Inmate Letter to the Central Office ITA staff. 5 10.2 Within five workdays of receiving the Inmate Letter, 6 Central Office ITA staff shall process the request and 7 generate an email with the signed certified statement, and a memo of instructions to the corresponding 8 Business Office. 9 10.3 The Business Office staff shall process and document the request in accordance with the Unit Certified 10 Statement Procedure. The signed Inmate Letter is 11 authorization to charge the inmate for the Certified Statement. 12 10.3.1 Inmates shall incur a charge $0.25 per page. 13 A notice shall be sent to the Business 14 Manager to collect the fee. If funds are not available, the inmate’s Spendable Account 15 shall be placed on hold for the amount. 16 10.4 The inmate shall present the completed form “Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis” and the 17 certified statements to their assigned Correctional 18 Officer III for certification. The certified application shall be returned to the inmate who is responsible for 19 filing a petition with the court. The application shall not 20 be certified by the unit’s Business Office. 21 III. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 22 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 23 against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 24 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff 25 has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which 26 relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from 27 such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)–(2). If the Court determines that a pleading could 28 be cured by the allegation of other facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to 1 amend a complaint before dismissal of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 2 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). 3 Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.4 requires in part that “[a]ll complaints . . . by 4 incarcerated persons must be signed and legibly written or typewritten on forms approved 5 by the Court and in accordance with the instructions provided with the forms.” Plaintiff’s 6 Complaint is not on the court-approved form. The Court may, in its discretion, forgo the 7 requirement that a plaintiff use a court-approved form. See LRCiv 3.4. The Court will 8 require use of the court-approved form because Plaintiff’s Complaint substantially differs 9 from the court-approved form. Thus, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed without 10 prejudice and with leave to amend, in order for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint on a 11 court-approved form. 12 The Court notes that Plaintiff seeks release from custody or treatment for his 13 hepatitis C. Plaintiff should be aware that he cannot obtain release from custody in a § 1983 14 action. See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973) (habeas corpus, not 42 U.S.C. 15

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Preiser v. Rodriguez
411 U.S. 475 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Rizzo v. Goode
423 U.S. 362 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of Alaska
673 F.2d 266 (Second Circuit, 1982)
Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, Sheriff
963 F.2d 1258 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Damous Nettles v. Randy Grounds
830 F.3d 922 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Lopez v. Smith
203 F.3d 1122 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Green 135999 v. Arizona Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/green-135999-v-arizona-department-of-corrections-azd-2023.