Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A.
413 So. 2d 133, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19918
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 1982·No. Nos. 81-169, 81-174·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The trial court order adjudging plaintiffs in contempt of court and ordering them to [134]*134pay to the defendants the sum of $250 per day for each and every day they remained in violation of orders requiring them to make discovery, is void for the failure of the order to contain findings that the alleged contemnors had the present ability to comply with the underlying discovery orders. Garo v. Garo, 347 So.2d 418 (Fla.1977); Epstein v. Epstein, 345 So.2d 398 (Fla.3d DCA 1977).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A., 413 So. 2d 133, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19918 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
413 So. 2d 133 (Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
CCI v. America II Electronics, Inc.
915 So. 2d 1278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Department of Children and Families v. RH
819 So. 2d 858 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Holderman v. Lobrano
617 So. 2d 874 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Paramount Advisors, Inc. v. Schwartz
591 So. 2d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Champagne-Webber-Anderson, Inc. v. Blanchard Machinery, Inc.
459 So. 2d 493 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A.
416 So. 2d 843 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)