Epstein v. Epstein

345 So. 2d 398, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15826
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 3, 1977
DocketNo. 76-1884
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 345 So. 2d 398 (Epstein v. Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Epstein v. Epstein, 345 So. 2d 398, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, former husband of the petitioner, appeals an order committing him for contempt for the failure to pay to the former wife approximately $13,400 in arrearages for child support and alimony. The commitment order must be reversed inasmuch as it fails to comply with the requirement that such an order include a [399]*399finding that the debtor is able to pay. Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So.2d 650 (Fla.1976).

A second order, assigned as error, denied the appellant’s motion to modify the judgment for child support. No error appears as to this order. See Castor v. Castor 316 So.2d 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

For the reason expressed, the order of commitment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to make such affirmative finding of ability if supported by the record or otherwise to vacate the order of contempt.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A.
413 So. 2d 133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 So. 2d 398, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epstein-v-epstein-fladistctapp-1977.