Grant v. State

779 So. 2d 669, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3494, 2001 WL 273592
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 745 So. 2d 519
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 21, 2001·No. No. 3D00-2411·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Grant, Jr., appeals an order denying his motion to correct scoresheet error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He contends that legal constraint points should not have been included on his scoresheet. We disagree and affirm the trial court order. This court has already held that the assessment of legal constraint points was proper in this case. Grant v. State, 547 So.2d 952, 952 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. State, 779 So. 2d 669, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3494, 2001 WL 273592 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

779 So. 2d 669 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grant v. State
547 So. 2d 952 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)