Grant v. State
731 So. 2d 735, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4087, 1999 WL 173669
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 745 So. 2d 519 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S. 594, 114 S.Ct. 2431, 129 L.Ed.2d 476 (1994)(confessions of arrested accomplices admissible if truly self-inculpa-tory, rather than attempt to shift blame or curry favor); Franqui v. State, 699 So.2d [736]*7361312 (Fla.1997)(same); Smith v. State, 699 So.2d 629 (Fla.1997)(setting forth circumstances in which non-testifying codefend-ant’s redacted confession is admissible with limiting jury instruction).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grant v. State, 731 So. 2d 735, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4087, 1999 WL 173669 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
731 So. 2d 735 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williamson v. United States
512 U.S. 594 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Smith v. State
699 So. 2d 629 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Franqui v. State
699 So. 2d 1312 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)