Graham v. State

181 So. 3d 582, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 184, 2016 WL 67298
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Graham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3400
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 6, 2016·No. 2D14-2750·Published

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Demhar Graham appeals his convictions for second-degree murder and tampering with physical evidence. We affirm his convictions without comment but remand for the trial court to enter a written order, nunc pro tunc, reflecting its oral finding that Graham was competent to proceed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.212(c)(7) (“If, at any time after such commitment, the court decides, after hearing, that the defendant is competent to proceed, it shall enter its order so finding and shall proceed.”); see, e.g., Carroll v. State, 157 So.3d 385, 386 *583 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Williams v. State, 130 So.3d 763, 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

VILLANTI, C.J., and BADALAMENTI, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. State, 181 So. 3d 582, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 184, 2016 WL 67298 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

181 So. 3d 582 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carroll v. State
157 So. 3d 385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Williams v. State
130 So. 3d 763 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)