Graham v. State

143 So. 3d 953, 2014 WL 2740536, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Graham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19139
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 2014·No. No. 4D14-825·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. In 1979, appellant was convicted of first-degree murder and kidnapping. He was sentenced to life without possibility of parole for twenty-five years for the murder and life for the kidnapping. In this motion, filed in September 2013, he claims that his life sentence for the non-homicide offense of kidnapping was illegal because he was seventeen years old at the time of the offenses. Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010).

The trial court determined that Graham applies only to a life without possibility of parole sentence. For the same reasons discussed in Atwell v. State, 128 So.3d 167, 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), we agree with the trial court. Graham applies only where a juvenile defendant is sentenced to life without possibility of parole for a non-homicide offense.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. State, 143 So. 3d 953, 2014 WL 2740536, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

143 So. 3d 953 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atwell v. State
128 So. 3d 167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)