Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Graham v. State

Graham v. State

134 So. 3d 1041, 2013 WL 264773, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 979
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 2013
DocketNo. 1D12-5290
StatusPublished

This text of 134 So. 3d 1041 (Graham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graham v. State, 134 So. 3d 1041, 2013 WL 264773, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 979 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472 (Fla.2003) (holding that generally, a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel).

PADOVANO, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 So. 3d 1041, 2013 WL 264773, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.