Graham v. State

820 So. 2d 1092, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10058, 2002 WL 1559742
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Graham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 748 So. 2d 1071
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 17, 2002·No. No. 3D01-3417·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s first point on appeal. We do, however, agree [1093]*1093that appellant cannot be legally convicted and sentenced for the crimes of possession of cocaine within one thousand feet of a school and possession of cocaine based on his possession of multiple quantities of cocaine at the same time and place. See Grene v. State, 702 So.2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Tucker v. State, 608 So.2d 122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s conviction and sentence on the charge of possession of cocaine with intent to sell and remand for discharge on that count.1

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. State, 820 So. 2d 1092, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10058, 2002 WL 1559742 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

820 So. 2d 1092 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grene v. State
702 So. 2d 510 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Tucker v. State
608 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)