Graham v. State
789 So. 2d 434, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8301, 2001 WL 686813
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Graham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 748 So. 2d 1071 →
Opinion
The order denying appellant’s motion to correct sentence is affirmed. Affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant to raise the new arguments he made on appeal and in the supplements filed in the circuit court in a sworn, legally sufficient postconviction motion. Any such motion must be filed in the circuit court within the time remaining under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graham v. State, 789 So. 2d 434, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8301, 2001 WL 686813 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
789 So. 2d 434 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.