Graham v. State
This text of 745 So. 2d 466 (Graham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Walter Graham, appeals his resentencing imposed as a result of this court’s mandate in Graham v. State, 577 So.2d 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The trial court resentenced appellant on Count II as directed by this court; however, in his brief, appellant challenges only his sentencing on Count I, which was not before the trial court at the resentencing hearing. We therefore do not address the challenge to the Count I sentence. See State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7, 9 (Fla.1974).
Accordingly, the sentence imposed by the trial court as to Count II is AFFIRMED.
Appellant filed a motion to correct illegal sentence in the trial court on December 20, 1995, by which he challenged his sentence on Count I. As of this time, the trial court has not made a determination on appellant’s motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
745 So. 2d 466, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15152, 1999 WL 1036486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.