Grage v. Venable

151 S.E.2d 926, 114 Ga. App. 570, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 852
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 4, 1966
Docket42364
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 151 S.E.2d 926 (Grage v. Venable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grage v. Venable, 151 S.E.2d 926, 114 Ga. App. 570, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 852 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Eelton, Chief Judge.

1. In the absence of an order of the judge of a superior court having fewer than six terms per year that the court be adjourned for the term five days before the beginning of the next term or earlier, it will be presumed that the court was adjourned by operation of law five days before the beginning of the next term. Shivers v. Shivers, 206 Ga. 552 (57 SE2d 660); Mathis v. Crowley, 146 Ga. 749 (92 SE 213).

2. The June, 1966, term of DeKalb Superior Court began on June 6, 1966, the first Monday in June. The March, 1966, term ended by operation of law no later than May 31, 1966. Ga. L. 1887, p. 58; Ga. L. 1896, p. 47; Ga. L. 1909, p. 97 (Code § 24-3010). As a consequence the court had no jurisdic[571]*571tion from June 1 to June 6, 1966, to perform a function which the law required to be performed in term time, such as granting a nisi on a petition to reconsider the denial of a summary-judgment issued at the March, 1966, term of the court. Code § 24-2622 (Ga. L. 1898, p. 89); Haskens v. State, 114 Ga. 837 (40 SE 997). We find no case holding to the contrary.

Argued October 4, 1966 Decided November 4, 1966. Gambrell, Harlan, Bussell & Moye, James H. Bratton, Jr., Sidney F. Wheeler, for appellant. Mitchell, Clarke, Pate & Anderson, Taylor W. Jones, for appellees.

3. It follows that the court had no jurisdiction on June 1, 1966, to issue a nisi on a motion (filed on June 1, 1966) to reconsider its denial of a summary judgment rendered at the March term, and to reconsider its judgment and grant a summary judgment. Since the court had no jurisdiction over the subject matter the judgment granting the summary judgment is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Frankum and Parnell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houston v. State
459 S.E.2d 583 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
McNeal v. Able
218 S.E.2d 460 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Stores, Inc. v. Kalfin
173 S.E.2d 219 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 S.E.2d 926, 114 Ga. App. 570, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grage-v-venable-gactapp-1966.