Shivers v. Shivers

57 S.E.2d 660, 206 Ga. 552, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 514
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 16, 1950
Docket16952
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 57 S.E.2d 660 (Shivers v. Shivers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shivers v. Shivers, 57 S.E.2d 660, 206 Ga. 552, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 514 (Ga. 1950).

Opinion

Head, Justice.

1. It not appearing from the record in this case that any order adjourning the July term of Cobb Superior Court was entered (Code, § 24-3008), it will be presumed that the term continued until five dajrs before the November term (Code, § 24-3010). Dover v. Dover, 205 Ga. 241 (2, 3) (53 S. E. 2d, 492). The order of October 1, 1949, to which exception is taken in this case, was rendered at the same term of court at which the original decree of July 19, 1949, was entered.

2. “The superior court has plenary power over its orders and judgments during the term at which they are entered, and may amend, correct, or revoke them, for the purpose of promoting justice.” Deen v. Baxley State Bank, 192 Ga. 303 (15 S. E. 2d, 194); Bowen v. Wyeth, 119 Ga. 687 (46 S. E. 823); Berrien County Bank v. Alexander, 154 Ga. 775, 778 (115 S. E. 648). “This power may be exercised by the court, at the same term, on his own motion without notice to either party.” Dover v. Dover, supra.

3. The judgment of the Florida court granting a divorce to the defendant, and awarding her custody of the minor child involved in the present action, is not shown to be invalid, and, accordingly, the judge of the superior court did not err in dismissing the citation for contempt and in modifying the decree of July 19, 1949, by revoking that part of the order awarding custody of the minor child to the petitioner. Brandon v. Brandon, 154 Ga. 661 (3) (115 S. E. 115)

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. *554 ,-Frank Lawson and Miller & Head, for plaintiff. .Willingham, Cheney, Hicks & Edwards, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Cheatham
259 S.E.2d 62 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
Grage v. Venable
151 S.E.2d 926 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Thornton v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of South Georgia, Inc.
147 S.E.2d 21 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Dunbar
143 S.E.2d 663 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Kimsey v. Caudell
135 S.E.2d 903 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
ARMOUR & COMPANY v. Youngblood
130 S.E.2d 786 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Allanson v. Vincent
114 S.E.2d 851 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Dugger v. Lauless
338 P.2d 660 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1959)
Lewis v. Lewis
108 S.E.2d 812 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
Potts v. SMITH GRAIN COMPANY, INC.
108 S.E.2d 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Hall v. FIRST NATL. BANK OF ATLANTA
73 S.E.2d 252 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 S.E.2d 660, 206 Ga. 552, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shivers-v-shivers-ga-1950.