Stores, Inc. v. Kalfin

173 S.E.2d 219, 226 Ga. 145, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 464
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 5, 1970
Docket25602
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 S.E.2d 219 (Stores, Inc. v. Kalfin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stores, Inc. v. Kalfin, 173 S.E.2d 219, 226 Ga. 145, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 464 (Ga. 1970).

Opinion

Nichols, Justice.

On April 1, 1968, an equitable petition was filed in the Superior Court of DeKalb County, and a temporary restraining order granted. On April 30, 1968, a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim was filed by the defendant and, after hearing evidence and argument of counsel, a judgment was rendered dismissing the plaintiff’s petition. On May 31, 1968, a motion to reconsider was filed in the trial court which, after amendments were filed by the plaintiff, was finally disposed of on July 17, 1969. A notice of appeal was filed on August 15, 1969'. Held:

1. Under the provisions of Code § 24-3010 the March, 1968, term of the Superior Court of DeKalb County adjourned five days prior to June 3, 1968, which would have been prior to the time the motion for reconsideration was filed, and the trial court was without jurisdiction to issue a rule nisi on [146]*146the motion. Compare Grage v. Venable, 114 Ga. App. 570 (151 SE2d 926), and citations. Nor was the case still within the breast of the court.

Submitted January 14, 1970 Decided February 5, 1970 Rehearing denied February 19, 1970. N. Krasner, pro se, D. Krasner, pro se, D. W. Krasner, for appellants.

2. Thus, assuming but not deciding that a timely motion to reconsider a judgment dismissing a-petition will stay the time for filing a notice of appeal (but see Wilson v. McQueen, 224 Ga. 420 (162 SE2d 313)), a motion to reconsider filed at a time when the case is no longer within the breast of the court would not have such effect and the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed and the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donnelly v. Stynchcombe
269 S.E.2d 10 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 S.E.2d 219, 226 Ga. 145, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stores-inc-v-kalfin-ga-1970.