Goyden v. State
607 A.2d 622, 128 N.J. 54, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 370
Opinions
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 256 KJ.Super. 438, 607 A2d 651 (1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goyden v. State, 607 A.2d 622, 128 N.J. 54, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 370 (N.J. 1992).
607 A.2d 622 (Goyden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DCPP VS. T.U.B. AND J.E.C.IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF C.I.B. (FG-07-164-14, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
161 A.3d 132 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017)
Townsend v. Pierre
60 A.3d 800 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2013)
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Lindquist v. City of Jersey City Fire Department
814 A.2d 1069 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2003)
American Motorists Insurance v. L-C-A Sales Co.
713 A.2d 1007 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1998)
Prettyman v. State
689 A.2d 1365 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
Means v. Baltimore County
689 A.2d 1238 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1997)
Reinhart v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours
685 A.2d 1301 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996)
Dietrich v. Toms River Bd. of Educ.
683 A.2d 212 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
Fiore v. Consolidated Freightways
659 A.2d 436 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1995)
Perez v. Monmouth Cable Vision
650 A.2d 1025 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
City of Newark v. PBA LOCAL 3
639 A.2d 333 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
State v. Cephas
637 A.2d 20 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1994)
Cairns v. City of East Orange
631 A.2d 978 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
Mathesius v. Saint Barnabas Medical Center
625 A.2d 567 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
Wernowski v. Continental Can Co.
618 A.2d 882 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)