Gowen v. Gilson
This text of 41 N.E. 594 (Gowen v. Gilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only assignment of error in this case is upon the action of the lower court in sustaining the appellees’ demurrer to the appellants’ complaint. The record discloses that after the ruling upon demurrer to the complaint the appellants filed an amended complaint upon which further steps were taken. That the filing of an amended pleading takes out of the record the original pleading and waives any error in the ruling upon such original pleading is well settled. Kennedy v. Anderson, 98 Ind. 151; Conley v. Dibber, 91 Ind. 413 ; State, ex rel., v. Hay, 88 Ind. 274; Berghoff v. McDonald, 87 Ind. 549; Eshelman v. Snyder, 82 Ind. 498 ; Miles v. Buchanan, 36 Ind. 490 ; Johnson v. Conklin, 119 Ind. 109 ; Earp v. Commissioners, etc., 36 Ind. 470 ; Aiken v. [329]*329Bruen, 21 Ind. 137; Patrick v. Jones, 21 Ind. 249; Elliott App. Proced., sections 595, 683. The record presenting no available error, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 N.E. 594, 142 Ind. 328, 1895 Ind. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gowen-v-gilson-ind-1895.