State ex rel. Gowen v. Jackson
This text of 41 N.E. 534 (State ex rel. Gowen v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellants were plaintiffs in the
suit helow, and after the trial court had sustained the demurrer to their complaint, they filed an amended complaint, upon which further proceedings were had. The only ruling of the circuit court assigned here as error is that above mentioned. The filing of an amended pleading not only takes from the record the original pleading, but waives any error which may have been committed in rulings upon such pleading. Johnson v. Conklin, 119 Ind. 109; Kennedy v. Anderson, 98 Ind. 151; Conley v. Dibber, 91 Ind. 413 ; State, ex rel., v. Hay, 88 Ind. 274; Berghoff v. McDonald, 87 Ind. 549; Eshelman v. Snyder, 82 Ind. 498; Miles v. Buchanan, 36 Ind. 490 ; Earp v. Commissioners, etc., 36 Ind. 470; [260]*260Aiken v. Bruen, 21 Ind. 137 ; Patrick v. Jones, 21 Ind. 249; Elliott App. Proced. 595, 683 ; Gowen v. Gilson, 142 Ind. 328, at this term.
The record presents no error, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 N.E. 534, 142 Ind. 259, 1895 Ind. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gowen-v-jackson-ind-1895.