State ex rel. Gowen v. Jackson

41 N.E. 534, 142 Ind. 259, 1895 Ind. LEXIS 161
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided October 11, 1895·No. No. 17,137·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Hackney, J.

The appellants were plaintiffs in the

suit helow, and after the trial court had sustained the demurrer to their complaint, they filed an amended complaint, upon which further proceedings were had. The only ruling of the circuit court assigned here as error is that above mentioned. The filing of an amended pleading not only takes from the record the original pleading, but waives any error which may have been committed in rulings upon such pleading. Johnson v. Conklin, 119 Ind. 109; Kennedy v. Anderson, 98 Ind. 151; Conley v. Dibber, 91 Ind. 413 ; State, ex rel., v. Hay, 88 Ind. 274; Berghoff v. McDonald, 87 Ind. 549; Eshelman v. Snyder, 82 Ind. 498; Miles v. Buchanan, 36 Ind. 490 ; Earp v. Commissioners, etc., 36 Ind. 470; [260]*260Aiken v. Bruen, 21 Ind. 137 ; Patrick v. Jones, 21 Ind. 249; Elliott App. Proced. 595, 683 ; Gowen v. Gilson, 142 Ind. 328, at this term.

Filed October 11, 1895.

The record presents no error, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Gowen v. Jackson, 41 N.E. 534, 142 Ind. 259, 1895 Ind. LEXIS 161 (Ind. 1895).

41 N.E. 534 (State ex rel. Gowen v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hutchison v. Adomatis
125 N.E.2d 251 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1955)
Guthrie v. Howland
73 N.E. 259 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1905)
Worl v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.
66 N.E. 1021 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1903)
Zimmerman v. Gaumer
53 N.E. 829 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1899)
Weaver v. Apple
46 N.E. 642 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1897)
Hedrick v. Whitehorn
43 N.E. 942 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1896)