Gosha v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gosha v. State

528 So. 2d 1389, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1924, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3707, 1988 WL 82681

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 10, 1988

DocketNo. 86-3165

StatusPublished

This text of 528 So. 2d 1389 (Gosha v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gosha v. State, 528 So. 2d 1389, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1924, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3707, 1988 WL 82681 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

The appellant appeals from his judgment and sentence, contending the trial court [1390]*1390erred in departing from the guidelines as two of the six reasons utilized by the trial court were invalid.

We agree with the appellant that two of the reasons were invalid, but as the appellant stipulates, the four remaining reasons were valid. After examining the record and facts of this case, it is evident beyond a reasonable doubt that the trial court would have departed from the recommended guidelines sentence absent the purportedly invalid reasons. See Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI