Concepcion v. State

679 So. 2d 891, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10034, 1996 WL 539623
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 1996·No. No. 96-747·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See United States v. Hiett, 581 F.2d 1199 (5th Cir.1978); Riechmann v. State, 581 So.2d 133 (Fla.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 952, 113 S.Ct. 405, 121 L.Ed.2d 331 (1992); Valdez v. State, 585 So.2d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Gosha v. State, 534 So.2d 912 [892]*892(Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Murvin v. State, 371 So.2d 1062 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Concepcion v. State, 679 So. 2d 891, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10034, 1996 WL 539623 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

679 So. 2d 891 (Concepcion v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Tommy Hiett
581 F.2d 1199 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Riechmann v. State
581 So. 2d 133 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Gosha v. State
534 So. 2d 912 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Murvin v. State
371 So. 2d 1062 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Valdez v. State
585 So. 2d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)