Goodwin Apartment Corp. v. Kronish
This text of 244 A.D. 747 (Goodwin Apartment Corp. v. Kronish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying the motion of defendant Kronish to vacate the notice of examination reversed on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that it appears that the relations between defendant Weinberg and the plaintiff, of which he was the former president and of which his wife is now the president, make him in effect a party plaintiff; that he is not a hostile witness and his examination before trial is not necessary, and the application for his examination is not in good faith. He should be called as a witness on the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Johnston, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodwin-apartment-corp-v-kronish-nyappdiv-1935.