Shapiro v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shapiro v. Goldstein

256 A.D. 996, 10 N.Y.S.2d 548

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1939·Published

Opinion

Order denying appellants’ application to examine J. Lester Shapiro before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The undisputed facts show that J. Lester Shapiro is in effect the plaintiff and that the named plaintiff is merely his dummy. The “ special circumstances ” referred to in section 288 of the Civil Practice Act are established. (Goodwin Apartment Corp. v. Kronish, 244 App. Div. 747; La Bonte v. Long Island R. R. Co., 242 id. 844; Rubel Corp. v. Rosoff, 251 id. 868.) Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appellants’ application to examine J. Lester Shapiro before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The undisputed facts show that J. Lester Shapiro is in effect the plaintiff and that the named plaintiff is merely his dummy. The “ special circumstances ” referred to in section 288 of the Civil Practice Act are established. (Goodwin Apartment Corp. v. Kronish, 244 App. Div. 747; La Bonte v. Long Island R. R. Co., 242 id. 844; Rubel Corp. v. Rosoff, 251 id. 868.) Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Shapiro v. Goldstein, 256 A.D. 996, 10 N.Y.S.2d 548 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

256 A.D. 996 (Shapiro v. Goldstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related