Goodwin Apartment Corp. v. Kronish

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goodwin Apartment Corp. v. Kronish

240 A.D. 728

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Goodwin Apartment Corp. v. Kronish. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 A.D. 747 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Order in so far as it denies the motion of defendant Kronish to have the complaint made more definite and certain and to have the statements of facts separately numbered affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to said defendant to serve his answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order in so far as it denies the motion of defendant Kronish to have the complaint made more definite and certain and to have the statements of facts separately numbered affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to said defendant to serve his answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Goodwin Apartment Corp. v. Kronish, 240 A.D. 728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

240 A.D. 728 (Goodwin Apartment Corp. v. Kronish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.