Golle v. State

246 S.W. 1040
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Golle v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 Tex. Crim. 233
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 17, 1923·No. No. 7337·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Erom a conviction for manufacturing whisky, with penalty of three years in the penitentiary, this appeal is prosecuted.

The appeal bond is'approved only by the sheriff, when it should also be approved by the trial judge; for this reason the state has ¡filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The following authorities support the motion. Article 904, C. O. P.; Cbumley v. State, 83 [1041] Tes. Or. R. 54, 201 S. W. 176; King y. State, 83 Tes. Cr. R. 304, 203 S. W. 52; Johnson y. State, 83 Tes. Or. R. 376, 203 S. W. 903; Gray v. State, 88 Tes. Or. R. 1, 224 S. W. 513.

The appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Golle v. State, 246 S.W. 1040 (Tex. 1923).

246 S.W. 1040 (Golle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
203 S.W. 903 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
King v. State
203 S.W. 52 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Chumley v. State
201 S.W. 176 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Gray v. State
224 S.W. 513 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)