Goldtree v. City of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Goldtree v. City of San Diego

97 P. 218, 8 Cal. App. 512, 1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 155

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 9, 1908

DocketCiv. No. 472.

StatusPublished

This text of 97 P. 218 (Goldtree v. City of San Diego) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldtree v. City of San Diego, 97 P. 218, 8 Cal. App. 512, 1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 155 (Cal. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REHEARING. The reasons for the decision rendered by this court on January 10, 1908, in this appeal and appeal No. 445 are approved and adopted, but our attention not having been particularly called to the form of the judgment on the former presentation of this appeal, we then overlooked the fact that a personal judgment had been improperly rendered against the defendants Howard and Long.

This matter is not here presented at this time by the appellant city of San Diego, but being presented and considered in civil appeal No. 445, the decision in which is this day filed, and an order to this effect being this day entered in that case.

It is hereby ordered that the said judgment be modified by striking out the names "P. A. Howard, John T. Long" following the words "do have and recover of and from the defendants," in paragraph 2 thereof, and that the judgment as so modified be affirmed.

Allen, P. J., and Shaw, J., concurred. *Page 514

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REHEARING. The reasons for the decision rendered by this court on January 10, 1908, in this appeal and appeal No. 445 are approved and adopted, but our attention not having been particularly called to the form of the judgment on the former presentation of this appeal, we then overlooked the fact that a personal judgment had been improperly rendered against the defendants Howard and Long.

This matter is not here presented at this time by the appellant city of San Diego, but being presented and considered in civil appeal No. 445, the decision in which is this day filed, and an order to this effect being this day entered in that case.

It is hereby ordered that the said judgment be modified by striking out the names "P. A. Howard, John T. Long" following the words "do have and recover of and from the defendants," in paragraph 2 thereof, and that the judgment as so modified be affirmed.

Allen, P. J., and Shaw, J., concurred. *Page 514

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 P. 218, 8 Cal. App. 512, 1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldtree-v-city-of-san-diego-calctapp-1908.