Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles

489 U.S. 1010, 109 S. Ct. 1117, 103 L. Ed. 2d 180, 57 U.S.L.W. 3550, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 852

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 21, 1989·No. No. 88-840·Published·Cited by 39 cases

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Whether in the absence of a direct violation of a federal statute, an allegation that a state statute is preempted by a federal statute is cognizable under 42 U. S. C. § 1983?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 489 U.S. 1010, 109 S. Ct. 1117, 103 L. Ed. 2d 180, 57 U.S.L.W. 3550, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 852 (1989).

Pincite

489 U.S. 1010 (Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State v. Barnes

582 S.E.2d 313 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)

State v. Henderson

574 S.E.2d 700 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)

State v. Nance

562 S.E.2d 557 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)

Krider v. Marshall

118 F. Supp. 2d 704 (S.D. West Virginia, 2000)

State v. Rose

909 P.2d 280 (Washington Supreme Court, 1996)

Jordan v. Town of Pratt

886 F. Supp. 555 (S.D. West Virginia, 1995)

Browning v. Snead

886 F. Supp. 547 (S.D. West Virginia, 1995)

Braxton v. Matthews

883 F. Supp. 1068 (W.D. Virginia, 1995)

State v. Wise

449 S.E.2d 774 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)

State v. Wooding

449 S.E.2d 760 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)

Braxton v. Matthews

865 F. Supp. 345 (S.D. West Virginia, 1994)

State v. Rose

876 P.2d 925 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1994)

State v. Ogden

880 P.2d 845 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1994)

Wiley v. Doory

14 F.3d 993 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)

Maciariello v. Sumner

973 F.2d 295 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)

Robert P. MacIariello Arnold Rowell v. W.B. Sumner, Chief of Police, in His Individual and Official Capacity Paul S. Paskoff, Lancaster City Administrator, in His Individual and Official Capacity, and City of Lancaster City of Lancaster Police Department, Robert P. MacIariello Arnold Rowell v. City of Lancaster City of Lancaster Police Department, W. B. Sumner, Chief of Police, in His Individual and Official Capacity Paul S. Paskoff, Lancaster City Administrator, in His Individual and Official Capacity

973 F.2d 295 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)

State v. Price

388 S.E.2d 84 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1990)

Martinez v. United States

566 A.2d 1049 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)

State v. Artis

384 S.E.2d 470 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1989)

Terry Kent Ringstaff v. Dale Howard and the Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Don Siegelman

885 F.2d 1542 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)

Opinion

Related