Glenn v. State
This text of 861 So. 2d 1289 (Glenn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joseph GLENN, Sr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Joseph Glenn, Sr., Daytona Beach, Pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Joseph Glenn, Sr., challenges the constitutionality of section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), on both procedural and substantive due process grounds. We conclude that the statute is not violative of due process for the reasons articulated by the First District Court of Appeal in Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), and by the Second District Court of Appeal in Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). See also Kelly v. State, 795 So.2d 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), review denied, 851 So.2d 729 (Fla.2003).
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA, C.J., GRIFFIN and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
861 So. 2d 1289, 2004 WL 40569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenn-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.