Glenn v. State

861 So. 2d 1289, 2004 WL 40569
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 2004·No. 5D03-2666·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

861 So.2d 1289 (2004)

Joseph GLENN, Sr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D03-2666.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 9, 2004.

Joseph Glenn, Sr., Daytona Beach, Pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Joseph Glenn, Sr., challenges the constitutionality of section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), on both procedural and substantive due process grounds. We conclude that the statute is not violative of due process for the reasons articulated by the First District Court of Appeal in Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), and by the Second District Court of Appeal in Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). See also Kelly v. State, 795 So.2d 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), review denied, 851 So.2d 729 (Fla.2003).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J., GRIFFIN and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glenn v. State, 861 So. 2d 1289, 2004 WL 40569 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

861 So. 2d 1289 (Glenn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kensler v. State
890 So. 2d 282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Thaden v. State
874 So. 2d 1238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Perkins v. State
884 So. 2d 964 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Lawhon v. State
868 So. 2d 634 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Hamlin v. State
864 So. 2d 1262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)