Thaden v. State

874 So. 2d 1238, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7568, 2004 WL 1176228
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 28, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-3341
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 874 So. 2d 1238 (Thaden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thaden v. State, 874 So. 2d 1238, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7568, 2004 WL 1176228 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585, 587 (Fla. 1st DCA) (rejecting appellant’s argument that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), violated his right to procedural due process, because it did not require a hearing to determine whether he posed a danger to the public), review ‘pending, No. SC03-2219 (Fla. Dec. 18, 2003). Accord Glenn v. State, 861 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kensler v. State
890 So. 2d 282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
874 So. 2d 1238, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7568, 2004 WL 1176228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thaden-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.