Thaden v. State
This text of 874 So. 2d 1238 (Thaden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585, 587 (Fla. 1st DCA) (rejecting appellant’s argument that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), violated his right to procedural due process, because it did not require a hearing to determine whether he posed a danger to the public), review ‘pending, No. SC03-2219 (Fla. Dec. 18, 2003). Accord Glenn v. State, 861 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
874 So. 2d 1238, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7568, 2004 WL 1176228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thaden-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.