Glenn v. McCarty
This text of 107 S.W.2d 363 (Glenn v. McCarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is reported in 103 S.W.(2d) 1098. The application for writ of error is insufficient and was improvidently granted. It does not disclose the result of the suit in'the Court of Civil Appeals or when its judgment was rendered. There is a statement on page 9 of the application that the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court, but that is erroneous. That court reversed and remanded the cause. It does not disclose that a motion for rehearing was filed in or acted upon by that court. A number of assignments of error appear, but it is not shown that they were called to the attention of the Court of Civil Appeals in a motion for rehearing. For these reasons, the application should be dismissed. Leonard Bros. v. Newton (Tex.Com.App.) 101 S.W.(2d) 223, and authorities there cited. This court does not therefore consider or express any opinion on the questions decided by the Court of Civil Appeals.
The application for writ of error is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 S.W.2d 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glenn-v-mccarty-tex-1937.