Glass v. State

352 S.E.2d 642, 181 Ga. App. 448, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 1442
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 5, 1987
Docket73319
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 352 S.E.2d 642 (Glass v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glass v. State, 352 S.E.2d 642, 181 Ga. App. 448, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 1442 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant Henry Levi Glass was tried before a jury and found guilty of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of OCGA § 16-11-131. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the trial court on the jury’s verdict.

1. The trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for a directed verdict of acquittal is enumerated as error.

The State offered as proof of appellant’s previous felony conviction a certified copy of the 1974 burglary conviction of one Henry Levi Glass. Appellant urges that, because the State made no showing that he was the same Henry Levi Glass who was convicted in 1974, his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal was erroneously denied.

Appellant “presented no evidence contradicting that he was the person named in the [1974] documents. ‘Concordance of name alone is some evidence of identity. [Cit.] Further, “in the absence of any denial by [appellant] and no proof to the contrary” this concordance of name is sufficient to show that [appellant] and the [individual] previously convicted were the same person. [Cits.]’ [Cit.]” Hill v. State, 162 Ga. App. 637-638 (2) (292 SE2d 512) (1982). Accordingly, this enumeration is without merit.

2. Appellant enumerates as error the trial court’s denial of a motion for mistrial. A motion for mistrial is not subject to review where, as here, the motion is not renewed following curative instructions. Kirksey v. State, 177 Ga. App. 428, 429 (3) (339 SE2d 401) (1986).

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J., concur. *449 Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pearson v. State
604 S.E.2d 180 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)
Simmons v. State
555 S.E.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
Lewis v. State
508 S.E.2d 218 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Johnson v. State
504 S.E.2d 8 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Adams v. State
430 S.E.2d 35 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Whatley v. State
398 S.E.2d 807 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Prophitt v. State
381 S.E.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Oller v. State
371 S.E.2d 455 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Mincey v. State
368 S.E.2d 796 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Powell v. State
364 S.E.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 S.E.2d 642, 181 Ga. App. 448, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 1442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glass-v-state-gactapp-1987.