Gilmore v. Georgian Co.

88 S.E. 416, 17 Ga. App. 759, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 913
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 27, 1916·No. 6767·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

In a certiorari case the answer of the trial judge is the only source from which knowledgé of the facts of the case and the rulings made therein can be derived. Buckner v. State, 115 Ga. 238 (41 S. E. 583). And where, in such a case, the trial judge in his answer states that he can not remember the facts of the case, or what occurred upon the trial, it is useless to sustain exceptions to the answer and to require him to respond more fully. Where such an answer is filed, the judge of the superior court, upon the hearing of the certiorari, can do nothing but overrule the same. Colbert v. State, 118 Ga. 302, 305 (45 S. E. 403). , Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilmore v. Georgian Co., 88 S.E. 416, 17 Ga. App. 759, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 913 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

88 S.E. 416 (Gilmore v. Georgian Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beavers v. Cassells
192 S.E. 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Shealey v. State
165 S.E. 451 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Cunningham v. City of Atlanta
141 S.E. 214 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Macris v. Tsipourses
134 S.E. 621 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Goodson v. Adams Grocery Co.
123 S.E. 748 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Kilpatrick v. Smith
123 S.E. 35 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Barron Bros. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
122 S.E. 83 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Hicks v. Lindsey
97 S.E. 101 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Rice v. Ray & McArthur
93 S.E. 43 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)