Gilmore v. Georgian Co.
This text of 88 S.E. 416 (Gilmore v. Georgian Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a certiorari case the answer of the trial judge is the only source from which knowledgé of the facts of the case and the rulings made therein can be derived. Buckner v. State, 115 Ga. 238 (41 S. E. 583). And where, in such a case, the trial judge in his answer states that he can not remember the facts of the case, or what occurred upon the trial, it is useless to sustain exceptions to the answer and to require him to respond more fully. Where such an answer is filed, the judge of the superior court, upon the hearing of the certiorari, can do nothing but overrule the same. Colbert v. State, 118 Ga. 302, 305 (45 S. E. 403). , Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 S.E. 416, 17 Ga. App. 759, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilmore-v-georgian-co-gactapp-1916.