Shealey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Shealey v. State

165 S.E. 451, 45 Ga. App. 518, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 589

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 31, 1932

Docket22415

StatusPublished

This text of 165 S.E. 451 (Shealey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shealey v. State, 165 S.E. 451, 45 Ga. App. 518, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 589 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. “In a certiorari case the answer of the trial judge is the only source from which knowledge of the facts of the case and the rulings made therein can be derived. Buckner v. State, 115 Ga. 238 (41 S. E. 583). And where, in such a case, the trial judge in his answer states that he can not remember the facts of the case, or what occurred upon the trial, it is useless to sustain exceptions to the answer and to require him to respond more fully. Where such an answer is filed, the judge of the superior court, upon the hearing of the certiorari, can do nothing but overrule the same. Colbert v. State, 118 Ga. 302, 305 (45 S. E. 403).” Gilmore v. Georgian Co., 17 Ga. App. 759 (88 S. E. 416).

2. Under the foregoing ruling and the facts of the instant case, the judge of the superior court properly overruled the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed).

Luke and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. “In a certiorari case the answer of the trial judge is the only source from which knowledge of the facts of the case and the rulings made therein can be derived. Buckner v. State, 115 Ga. 238 (41 S. E. 583). And where, in such a case, the trial judge in his answer states that he can not remember the facts of the case, or what occurred upon the trial, it is useless to sustain exceptions to the answer and to require him to respond more fully. Where such an answer is filed, the judge of the superior court, upon the hearing of the certiorari, can do nothing but overrule the same. Colbert v. State, 118 Ga. 302, 305 (45 S. E. 403).” Gilmore v. Georgian Co., 17 Ga. App. 759 (88 S. E. 416).

2. Under the foregoing ruling and the facts of the instant case, the judge of the superior court properly overruled the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed).

Luke and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 S.E. 451, 45 Ga. App. 518, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shealey-v-state-gactapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack